FAR guidance for understanding how the FASB, SEC, GASB, PCC, EITF, and related bodies shape U.S. financial reporting authority.
FAR expects you to know which body sets which accounting rules and how that authority affects financial reporting. The key is not a long history of standard setting. The exam issue is whether you can identify the proper source of guidance for a for-profit company, SEC registrant, private company, state or local government, or specialized reporting question.
The most common mistake is treating all accounting organizations as interchangeable. FASB, SEC, GASB, PCC, and EITF have different roles. Knowing those boundaries helps you choose the right framework before applying recognition, measurement, presentation, or disclosure rules.
| Body | Primary role | FAR application |
|---|---|---|
| FASB | Establishes U.S. GAAP for nongovernmental entities through the Codification. | Default source for U.S. for-profit and private-company GAAP questions. |
| SEC | Has statutory authority over public-company reporting and filings. | Applies when the facts involve an SEC registrant, 10-K, 10-Q, 8-K, or public offering. |
| GASB | Establishes accounting standards for U.S. state and local governments. | Applies to governmental accounting questions, not ordinary corporate GAAP. |
| FAF | Oversees and appoints members of the FASB and GASB. | Governance body, not the day-to-day source of individual accounting rules. |
| PCC | Advises FASB on private-company alternatives and simplifications. | Explains why some private companies may use GAAP alternatives. |
| EITF | Addresses narrow emerging issues that can be incorporated into GAAP. | Helps reduce diversity in practice for specific transaction questions. |
| IASB | Issues IFRS for jurisdictions that use international standards. | Relevant only when the question explicitly asks for IFRS comparison or foreign reporting context. |
For most FAR questions involving U.S. nongovernmental entities, begin with FASB guidance. Move to SEC considerations only when the entity is public or the facts involve securities filings. Move to GASB when the entity is a state or local government.
flowchart TB
A["U.S. Congress"] --> B["SEC statutory authority for public companies"]
B --> C["Recognizes FASB standards for U.S. GAAP"]
C --> D["FASB Accounting Standards Codification"]
E["FAF oversight"] --> C
E --> F["GASB standards for state and local governments"]
G["PCC private-company input"] --> C
H["EITF emerging-issue consensus"] --> C
B --> I["SEC filing, presentation, and disclosure requirements"]
The diagram shows why the SEC and FASB both matter for public companies. The SEC has legal authority over public-company reporting, while the FASB provides the recognized accounting standards incorporated into U.S. GAAP.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board is the principal standard setter for nongovernmental U.S. GAAP. Its standards are organized in the Accounting Standards Codification. When the FASB changes GAAP, it issues an Accounting Standards Update, and the authoritative content is incorporated into the Codification.
| FASB-related item | What to remember |
|---|---|
| Codification | The organized source of authoritative nongovernmental U.S. GAAP. |
| Accounting Standards Update | Describes a change to the Codification, transition rules, and effective dates. |
| Conceptual Framework | Supports standard setting but does not override specific Codification guidance. |
| Due process | Includes research, exposure drafts, public feedback, and final standards. |
FAR questions may ask whether the Conceptual Framework is authoritative for resolving a specific transaction. It is important, but it does not supersede a directly applicable standard.
The Securities and Exchange Commission has statutory authority over accounting and reporting for U.S. public companies. In practice, the SEC recognizes FASB as the standard setter for U.S. GAAP, but the SEC can add filing, presentation, disclosure, and enforcement requirements for registrants.
| SEC-related fact | Likely implication |
|---|---|
| Company files a Form 10-K or 10-Q | Public-company reporting and SEC disclosure requirements may apply. |
| Company is issuing securities to the public | Securities Act registration and public offering disclosures may matter. |
| SEC comments on a filing | The issue may involve disclosure adequacy or GAAP application. |
| Regulation S-X or S-K is referenced | SEC presentation and disclosure rules are in play. |
The exam trap is applying SEC rules to every entity. SEC guidance is especially relevant when the fact pattern identifies a public company, registrant, public offering, or SEC filing.
GASB sets accounting standards for U.S. state and local governments. It is separate from FASB, even though both operate under FAF oversight.
| Entity | Standard-setting framework |
|---|---|
| City, county, public school district, or state agency | GASB standards |
| Nongovernmental for-profit company | FASB standards |
| Nongovernmental not-for-profit organization | FASB NFP guidance |
| Federal government entity | Federal accounting guidance, not ordinary FASB or GASB corporate reporting |
FAR governmental accounting questions rely on governmental reporting concepts such as fund accounting, measurement focus, basis of accounting, and government-wide statements. Do not force corporate FASB rules onto governmental fact patterns.
The Private Company Council works with the FASB on private-company accounting alternatives. These alternatives are designed to reduce cost and complexity while preserving decision-useful information for private-company users.
Private-company alternatives can affect topics such as goodwill, identifiable intangible assets in certain combinations, and other areas where private-company users may not need the same level of complexity as public-company users. The key for FAR is not to memorize every alternative. It is to recognize that private-company facts can change the available accounting choices when the standard permits an alternative.
The Emerging Issues Task Force addresses narrow, timely accounting questions when diversity in practice could develop. EITF conclusions can become part of authoritative guidance after FASB approval and Codification incorporation.
| EITF feature | FAR relevance |
|---|---|
| Narrow scope | Usually addresses specific transaction patterns rather than broad concepts. |
| Timely resolution | Reduces diversity before practice becomes inconsistent. |
| FASB approval and Codification | The authoritative answer ultimately flows into GAAP. |
For exam purposes, EITF is a mechanism that supports consistent GAAP application. It is not an enforcement agency and does not set governmental standards.
The International Accounting Standards Board issues IFRS. FAR is primarily a U.S. CPA exam section, so IASB content should not displace U.S. GAAP unless the question explicitly asks for an international comparison or foreign reporting context.
| If the fact pattern says | Default response |
|---|---|
| U.S. public company | Apply U.S. GAAP and consider SEC overlay. |
| U.S. private company | Apply FASB guidance and any available private-company alternatives if relevant. |
| State or local government | Apply GASB guidance. |
| IFRS comparison | Compare to IASB/IFRS only because the question asks for it. |
This boundary prevents IFRS details from contaminating ordinary U.S. FAR answers.
Use this sequence when a question asks which body or guidance applies:
| Fact pattern | Correct authority focus |
|---|---|
| Private manufacturer preparing U.S. GAAP financial statements | FASB Codification |
| Public company preparing a Form 10-K | FASB Codification plus SEC requirements |
| City preparing annual financial statements | GASB standards |
| Private company electing a permitted simplification | FASB guidance with PCC-related alternative |
| Foreign private issuer using IFRS | IASB/IFRS context if specified |
| Trap | Correct approach |
|---|---|
| Treating SEC as the daily writer of all GAAP | SEC has public-company authority, but FASB is the recognized U.S. GAAP standard setter. |
| Applying FASB corporate rules to state and local governments | Use GASB for state and local governmental entities. |
| Treating the Conceptual Framework as overriding standards | Specific authoritative standards control. |
| Assuming private-company alternatives apply to public companies | Private-company alternatives are not public-company defaults. |
| Treating EITF as an enforcement regulator | EITF resolves narrow emerging accounting issues. |
| Using IFRS when no comparison is requested | Apply U.S. GAAP unless IFRS is explicitly in the fact pattern. |