How reporting and disclosure issues are handled in employee benefit plan audits.
Employee Benefit Plan (EBP) audits involve specific reporting requirements and detailed disclosures designed to address the Department of Labor (DOL), the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), and participant needs. These requirements can vary based on the nature of the plan—defined contribution, defined benefit, health and welfare plans, or employee stock ownership plans (ESOPs)—but certain fundamentals remain consistent. This section explores the required financial statements, supplemental schedules, and the nuances of the auditor’s opinion for EBP engagements.
The typical financial statements required for an EBP audit encompass:
For defined benefit pension plans, actuarial information also needs to be presented, such as changes in plan obligations and the plan’s funded status. These disclosures ensure transparency about the plan’s health and ability to meet future obligations to participants.
This statement provides a snapshot of the plan’s fiduciary net position as of the end of the plan year. It commonly lists:
• Investments: Equity and debt securities, real estate, mutual funds, and other investments.
• Participant loans: Loans extended to participants from their vested plan balances.
• Receivables: Contributions owed to the plan but not yet received.
• Liabilities: Payables or short-term obligations, if any, at the plan level.
The Statement of Net Assets Available for Benefits may also detail separate classes or types of investments for clarity, such as segregating equity mutual funds from fixed-income mutual funds. Some plans elect to further break out investments by major categories or strategies to illustrate diversification.
In this statement, the plan discloses:
• Contributions: Participant and employer contributions, including both cash contributions and any non-cash contributions of securities.
• Investment income (loss): Interest, dividends, and realized/unrealized gains or losses.
• Benefit payments and withdrawals: Payments to participants during the plan year, including lump sum distributions, scheduled payouts, or hardship withdrawals.
• Administrative expenses: Fees for investment management, recordkeeping, or legal services.
This statement reveals how the plan’s resources increased or decreased over the reporting period, highlighting the net effect of contributions, investment performance, and benefit payouts.
Defined benefit plans must include additional information pertaining to the present value of accumulated benefits and funded status. This often involves presenting:
• Actuarial assumptions (e.g., discount rates, expected long-term rate of return on plan assets).
• Changes in the projected benefit obligation (PBO) over the period.
• The plan’s funding level and any underfunded or overfunded status.
These disclosures illuminate the plan’s ability to meet future obligations to participants and reveal the financial risks associated with the plan’s funding.
Under the Department of Labor (DOL) and Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) regulations, certain schedules must accompany the plan’s Form 5500 filing (or be attached to the financial statements used for the audit). Key supplemental schedules include:
These schedules offer transparency regarding the plan’s transactions and investment holdings. For example:
• The Schedule of Assets Held at End of Year discloses each investment, including cost basis if required, and helps regulators and participants understand the diversification or concentration risks within the plan.
• The Schedule of Reportable Transactions summarizes large or frequent transactions, highlighting any potential self-dealing or conflicts of interest.
• The auditor’s report will refer to whether these supplemental schedules were subjected to auditing procedures or were part of a limited-scope audit.
Below is a simplified representation of a Schedule of Assets Held at End of Year, indicating the investment categories and fair values at year-end.
graph LR
A["Schedule of Assets Held <br> at End of Year"] --> B["List of Investments <br> (Mutual Funds, Stocks, Bonds)"]
B --> C["Description and <br> Identifying Information"]
B --> D["Fair Value<br> at Year-End"]
B --> E["Cost or Basis<br>(if required)"]
In practical terms, each line item may also include details such as CUSIP numbers, maturity dates (for bonds), and other descriptors to ensure completeness and traceability.
In EBP audits, the nature of the engagement can differ based on the extent of auditor responsibility for investment information. Two primary types of opinions exist:
Full-Scope Audit
In a full-scope EBP audit, the auditor examines all plan investments, contributions, benefit payments, and other financial information. The auditor expresses an opinion on whether the financial statements, in all material respects, present the plan’s financial status and changes in net assets available for benefits.
Limited-Scope Audit
Under ERISA Section 103(a)(3)(C), a plan administrator may elect to exclude from the audit certain investment information if a qualified institution (e.g., a bank or insurance carrier) certifies the completeness and accuracy of that information. In this scenario, the auditor’s opinion disclaims responsibility for the certified investment portion of the financial statements and expresses a limited-scope opinion on the remaining financial statement components.
In a full-scope audit, the opinion often reads as an unmodified (or “clean”) opinion if no material misstatements or compliance issues are identified. The auditor’s report explicitly states that the financial statements “present fairly, in all material respects,” the net assets and changes in net assets available for benefits, in conformity with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP).
In a limited-scope audit report, the auditor may issue the following:
• A disclaimer of opinion on the portion of the financial statements relating to the certified investment information.
• An opinion (often unmodified) on the remaining aspects of the plan’s financial statements that are within the auditor’s scope.
The auditor’s report clearly identifies the limitation imposed by management’s election under ERISA Section 103(a)(3)(C) and references the certification provided by the qualified institution.
Footnote disclosures for EBPs can be extensive, covering areas such as:
Clear and comprehensive footnotes help participants, regulators, and other stakeholders understand the financial position and operational risks of the plan.
Auditors and plan administrators need to address several challenges when preparing and reviewing EBP audits:
• Timely and Complete Documentation: Gathering participant data, investment statements, and contribution records can be complex. Early planning and a sound internal control environment help mitigate complications.
• Valuation of Hard-to-Value Investments: Plans may hold illiquid assets, such as real estate or privately held securities. Auditor procedures must ensure that valuations are reasonable.
• Compliance with DOL Requirements: Failure to properly include the required supplemental schedules or adequately disclose prohibited transactions may result in DOL sanctions or rework of filed documents.
• Limited-Scope vs. Full-Scope Engagement: Ensuring consistency between the scope, the certification, and the final auditor’s report is critical to avoid confusion or misstatement.
• Monitoring Subsequent Events: Benefit plan changes, purchases or sales of significant assets, or litigation arising after the balance sheet date should be considered for proper disclosure.
Consider a mid-sized manufacturing company sponsoring a 401(k) plan. Near year-end, the company acquired a new division, resulting in an influx of participants. This situation increases the risk of errors in participant contribution eligibility and enrollment. During the EBP audit:
Such real-world scenarios underscore the importance of thorough planning, validation of data, and proper presentation of all relevant financial and operational events in the EBP’s financial statements.
Below is a high-level overview of an EBP audit process, emphasizing reporting and walkthrough activities:
flowchart LR
A["Plan Sponsor <br> Documents & Records"] --> B("EBP Audit Fieldwork")
B --> C["Testing of Investments,<br> Contributions, and<br> Benefit Payments"]
C --> D["Review of Internal Controls<br> & Plan Provisions"]
D --> E["Draft Financial Statements<br> & Footnote Disclosures"]
E --> F["Auditor’s Opinion &<br> Supplemental Schedules"]
F --> G["Final Audit Report<br> & Form 5500 Filing"]
• AU-C Section 703 for EBP audits (AICPA): Provides comprehensive guidance on auditing employee benefit plans.
• DOL rules on required schedules: Refer to the official “Instructions for Form 5500” to understand the scope and content of supplemental schedules.
• AICPA Employee Benefit Plans Audit Quality Center Toolkit: Offers illustrative footnotes, checklists, and best practices targeted for EBP audits.
• PCAOB Staff Guidance (if the plan is sponsored by a public company): Additional direction for audits tied to public companies, such as 11-K filings.
Disclaimer: This course is not endorsed by or affiliated with the AICPA, NASBA, or any official CPA Examination authority. All content is created solely for educational and preparatory purposes.