Accounting Changes, Estimate Revisions, and Error Corrections

FAR coverage for accounting principle changes, estimate revisions, retrospective application, and prior-period corrections.

Accounting changes and error corrections are tested in FAR because the same new fact can lead to very different reporting treatment. A change in accounting principle usually points toward retrospective application. A change in estimate is handled prospectively. A material error correction generally requires prior-period restatement. The exam task is to classify the event first, then apply the correct financial statement treatment.

The safest approach is to ask whether the prior statements were wrong. If they were wrong based on information that was available at the time, the issue is an error correction. If the prior statements were reasonable but a new method is now preferable, the issue may be a principle change. If new information changes a judgment about useful life, collectibility, warranty cost, or similar uncertainty, the issue is usually an estimate revision.

In This Chapter

Lesson Main question What to master
Accounting Principle Changes and Estimate Revisions Is the issue a new accounting method, a revised estimate, or a combined change? Principle-versus-estimate classification, preferability, and prospective estimate treatment
Retrospective and Prospective Application of Accounting Changes Should prior periods be restated or only future periods change? Retrospective application, prospective application, impracticability, and retained earnings effects
Error Corrections and Prior-Period Adjustments Were prior financial statements misstated? Material error correction, comparative restatement, opening retained earnings adjustments, and disclosure

Classification Map

    flowchart TB
	    A["New fact or reporting change appears"] --> B{"Were prior statements wrong based on information then available?"}
	    B -->|"Yes"| C["Error correction"]
	    C --> D["Restate prior periods if material"]
	    B -->|"No"| E{"Is the entity changing from one acceptable principle to another?"}
	    E -->|"Yes"| F["Change in accounting principle"]
	    F --> G["Apply retrospectively unless impracticable or specific guidance says otherwise"]
	    E -->|"No"| H{"Is the change driven by new information about an estimate?"}
	    H -->|"Yes"| I["Change in accounting estimate"]
	    I --> J["Apply prospectively"]
	    H -->|"No"| K["Analyze reporting-entity or standard-specific guidance"]

Reporting Treatment Checkpoints

Classification Prior statements wrong? Usual treatment
Change in accounting principle No, if both principles are acceptable and the new principle is preferable. Apply retrospectively unless impracticable or specific guidance requires another method.
Change in accounting estimate No, if new information changes a reasonable estimate. Apply prospectively in the current and future periods affected.
Change in estimate effected by a change in principle Usually no, when the new method better reflects updated expectations. Treat as a change in estimate and apply prospectively.
Error correction Yes, if prior statements were misstated based on information available then. Restate prior periods if material and adjust opening retained earnings as needed.
Change in reporting entity Prior statements may need recasting for comparability. Apply retrospectively to present the new reporting entity consistently.

How to Use This Chapter

  • Classify the event before deciding the adjustment method.
  • Separate “new information” from “old information that was missed or misapplied.”
  • Treat estimate revisions prospectively unless the facts show a prior-period error.
  • Remember that a change in depreciation method is often treated as a change in estimate effected by a change in principle.
  • Return here when a FAR miss involves retained earnings, comparative statement restatement, preferability, impracticability, or prior-period correction.

In this section

Revised on Monday, June 15, 2026