FAR coverage for accounting principle changes, estimate revisions, retrospective application, and prior-period corrections.
Accounting changes and error corrections are tested in FAR because the same new fact can lead to very different reporting treatment. A change in accounting principle usually points toward retrospective application. A change in estimate is handled prospectively. A material error correction generally requires prior-period restatement. The exam task is to classify the event first, then apply the correct financial statement treatment.
The safest approach is to ask whether the prior statements were wrong. If they were wrong based on information that was available at the time, the issue is an error correction. If the prior statements were reasonable but a new method is now preferable, the issue may be a principle change. If new information changes a judgment about useful life, collectibility, warranty cost, or similar uncertainty, the issue is usually an estimate revision.
| Lesson | Main question | What to master |
|---|---|---|
| Accounting Principle Changes and Estimate Revisions | Is the issue a new accounting method, a revised estimate, or a combined change? | Principle-versus-estimate classification, preferability, and prospective estimate treatment |
| Retrospective and Prospective Application of Accounting Changes | Should prior periods be restated or only future periods change? | Retrospective application, prospective application, impracticability, and retained earnings effects |
| Error Corrections and Prior-Period Adjustments | Were prior financial statements misstated? | Material error correction, comparative restatement, opening retained earnings adjustments, and disclosure |
flowchart TB
A["New fact or reporting change appears"] --> B{"Were prior statements wrong based on information then available?"}
B -->|"Yes"| C["Error correction"]
C --> D["Restate prior periods if material"]
B -->|"No"| E{"Is the entity changing from one acceptable principle to another?"}
E -->|"Yes"| F["Change in accounting principle"]
F --> G["Apply retrospectively unless impracticable or specific guidance says otherwise"]
E -->|"No"| H{"Is the change driven by new information about an estimate?"}
H -->|"Yes"| I["Change in accounting estimate"]
I --> J["Apply prospectively"]
H -->|"No"| K["Analyze reporting-entity or standard-specific guidance"]
| Classification | Prior statements wrong? | Usual treatment |
|---|---|---|
| Change in accounting principle | No, if both principles are acceptable and the new principle is preferable. | Apply retrospectively unless impracticable or specific guidance requires another method. |
| Change in accounting estimate | No, if new information changes a reasonable estimate. | Apply prospectively in the current and future periods affected. |
| Change in estimate effected by a change in principle | Usually no, when the new method better reflects updated expectations. | Treat as a change in estimate and apply prospectively. |
| Error correction | Yes, if prior statements were misstated based on information available then. | Restate prior periods if material and adjust opening retained earnings as needed. |
| Change in reporting entity | Prior statements may need recasting for comparability. | Apply retrospectively to present the new reporting entity consistently. |