FAR treatment for deferred tax asset realizability, net operating losses, valuation allowances, and intraperiod allocation.
ASC 740 requires more than recording deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities at the expected enacted tax rate. FAR candidates also need to decide whether a deferred tax asset is realizable, how net operating loss carryforwards affect the tax provision, and where the related tax effects appear in the financial statements.
The exam usually tests this topic through a fact pattern: an entity has deductible temporary differences, loss carryforwards, recent operating losses, discontinued operations, or items in other comprehensive income. The correct answer depends on separating recognition, valuation, and presentation.
A deferred tax asset is recognized for deductible temporary differences, operating loss carryforwards, and tax credit carryforwards when those items can reduce taxable income in a future period. ASC 740 then requires the entity to evaluate whether the asset is more likely than not to be realized. In this context, more likely than not means a likelihood greater than 50%.
If realization is not more likely than not for all or part of the deferred tax asset, the entity records a valuation allowance. The allowance is a contra-asset account that reduces the deferred tax asset to the amount expected to be realized.
[ \text{Net deferred tax asset} = \text{Gross deferred tax asset} - \text{Valuation allowance} ]
The assessment is based on all available positive and negative evidence. Negative evidence that is objective, such as cumulative recent losses, is often difficult to overcome with unsupported forecasts.
| Evidence type | Examples | Exam significance |
|---|---|---|
| Positive evidence | Future reversals of taxable temporary differences, reliable forecasts of taxable income, available tax-planning strategies, carryback availability when enacted law permits it | Supports recognition of a larger net deferred tax asset |
| Negative evidence | Cumulative losses, expiring carryforwards, weak or speculative forecasts, operating uncertainty, a short history of profitability | Supports recording or increasing a valuation allowance |
The allowance is reassessed each reporting period. If new evidence shows that more of the deferred tax asset is realizable, the valuation allowance is reduced. If evidence weakens, the allowance is increased.
The valuation allowance analysis focuses on taxable income, not book income alone. A company may report a book loss while still having taxable income from reversals of taxable temporary differences, or it may report book income that does not support a specific deductible tax benefit.
| Source | How it supports realizability | FAR trap |
|---|---|---|
| Future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences | Taxable temporary differences will create taxable income in future periods | Do not ignore the reversal pattern and timing |
| Future taxable income excluding reversals | Forecasted operations may produce taxable income before carryforwards expire or become limited | Unsupported optimism is weaker than objective evidence |
| Tax-planning strategies | Prudent and feasible actions may create taxable income or preserve deductions | Strategies must be available and supportable, not merely possible |
| Carryback potential | Some tax benefits may be recoverable from prior taxable income when enacted tax law permits carrybacks | Do not assume every operating loss produces an immediate refund |
This decision flow is a compact way to read most FAR valuation allowance questions:
flowchart TB
A["Identify the gross deferred tax asset"] --> B["Evaluate positive and negative evidence"]
B --> C{"More likely than not realizable?"}
C -->|Yes| D["Recognize the realizable net DTA"]
C -->|No| E["Record a valuation allowance for the unrealizable portion"]
D --> F["Reassess at each reporting date"]
E --> F
A net operating loss arises when tax deductions exceed taxable income for the period. For financial reporting, a loss carryforward can create a deferred tax asset because the loss may reduce taxable income in a future period.
[ \text{NOL deferred tax asset} = \text{Carryforward available under enacted tax law} \times \text{enacted tax rate expected at utilization} ]
The gross asset is not the final answer. The entity must still evaluate carryforward expiration, utilization limits, expected taxable income, tax-planning strategies, and other evidence affecting realization. These legal limits are based on enacted tax law, so a FAR answer should not assume that every NOL is fully usable.
For example, assume an entity has a $1,000,000 operating loss carryforward and an enacted tax rate of 25% expected to apply when the loss is used. The gross deferred tax asset is $250,000. If the evidence supports realization of only $600,000 of the loss, the realizable deferred tax asset is $150,000 and the valuation allowance is $100,000.
| Item | Calculation | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Gross deferred tax asset | $1,000,000 x 25% | $250,000 |
| Realizable deferred tax asset | $600,000 x 25% | $150,000 |
| Valuation allowance | $250,000 - $150,000 | $100,000 |
Intraperiod tax allocation assigns the tax expense or benefit for the period to the financial statement components that caused the tax effects. The goal is not merely to compute total tax expense. The goal is to show the tax effect in the same area as the related pretax item.
Common components include:
For exam purposes, remember that continuing operations usually receives the tax effect of ordinary operating income and many valuation allowance changes. Discontinued operations, OCI, and direct-to-equity items receive their own tax effects when the tax effect is specifically associated with those components.
| Component | Pretax amount | Tax rate | Tax allocation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Continuing operations income | $400,000 | 25% | $100,000 tax expense |
| Discontinued operations loss | $(100,000) | 25% | $(25,000) tax benefit |
| OCI gain | $50,000 | 25% | $12,500 tax expense in OCI |
| Total allocation | $350,000 net effect | $87,500 net tax expense |
The allocation should reconcile to the total tax effect for the period, while still preserving presentation by component. A common exam mistake is to force all tax expense into continuing operations simply because the tax provision is computed centrally.
Valuation allowance changes usually affect income tax expense or benefit from continuing operations unless the change is directly related to an item reported outside continuing operations. This point matters when the same fact pattern includes an NOL carryforward, OCI, and discontinued operations.
For example, if management concludes that general future profitability no longer supports a deferred tax asset, the valuation allowance increase normally affects continuing operations. If a valuation allowance change is directly associated with an item recognized in OCI, the allocation may follow that item. FAR questions often test whether the candidate can identify the source of the tax effect rather than mechanically putting every adjustment in one line.
| Pitfall | Better exam response |
|---|---|
| Recognizing the full deferred tax asset despite strong negative evidence | Record a valuation allowance for the portion not more likely than not realizable |
| Treating an NOL as an automatic current refund | Analyze enacted carryback or carryforward rules and expected future taxable income |
| Using a “probable” threshold under U.S. GAAP | Apply the more-likely-than-not threshold for ASC 740 valuation allowances |
| Calling the valuation allowance a liability | Treat it as a contra deferred tax asset |
| Allocating all tax effects to continuing operations | Allocate tax effects to discontinued operations, OCI, and equity when the related item is reported there |
| Forgetting reassessment | Reevaluate the allowance at every reporting date |